God is Love
Recently, I see a lot of posts about vulnerability, mostly accepting it as a positive human construct. It is encouraging to feel this wave of perception that has risen and is relentlessly touching thousands of kindred souls.
Of course, my friends and fellow travelers! Vulnerability is an honest human construct. Fear, doubt, frustration, hurt, failure, depression, angst, anxiety, insecurity all are sensory responses to varied external stimuli.
I find movies a good place to quote or to draw parallels from. The iconic martial artists, actor and stunt man, Jackie Chan brought something fresh and new to the erstwhile martial art movies. His movies introduce vulnerability with impeccable comic timing. He made the people, the viewers relate to the troubles of the protagonist. The heroes also get hurt and why not, they are human beings, made up of flesh and bones. They are susceptible to emotions, circumstances, to the people in their lives. Of course a hero wins at last, but it is usually after he learns from his mistakes and learns to adapt.
We are conditioned, programmed to believe that vulnerability is a sign of weakness. A valid point, apparently. But what is weakness? Have we analyzed weakness enough to understand it. Or have we made a rapid connection to the word, and formed a thesaurus of words like bad, lack of strength, inability, inadequacy, imperfection and so on? What if we look closer, spend a little time with vulnerability? We begin to realize, hey, it is more a tendency, just like our tendency to laugh at jokes, or the tendency to feel bad. We are sentient beings, we are meant too feel. If we were not vulnerable, why would we feel hurt?
Vulnerability is the nature of the garb, this human body. Human beings are susceptible to change, vulnerable to the world around them. What is vulnerability, if not heightened sensitivity and awareness. It is this awareness that makes us such a wonderful species. Vulnerability to thought, emotions, stimuli, environment and practically everything perceivable and tangible. Accepting vulnerability brings us closer to our awareness. What do we find when we are past vulnerability, a rewarding revelation, that we are still here! We continue to be, so can this be a weakness then? How can anything be a weakness, isn’t it just strength in disguise.
Accepting vulnerability takes us to something indomitable, invulnerable and imperishable viz. the human spirit.
Here are some choice posts that I enjoyed for their honesty
- Vulnerability. (silhouettedreamer.wordpress.com)
- Vulnerability Is Your Greatest Asset! (terapearsoninks.wordpress.com)
- The One Quality We Often Mistake For Weakness Can Actually Make You Stronger (jtm71.wordpress.com)
- How Vulnerability Feels (chelseakennedyczt.wordpress.com)
- The Vulnerability Veil (nspire1blog.wordpress.com)
- Reprioritizing Passion (kieradailey.wordpress.com)
- When we deny our own vulnerability, we cope by being cruel to others | Giles Fraser (theguardian.com)
- The Strength in Vulnerability (apattersonmba.wordpress.com)
- Vulnerable (losingstuffgainingfreedom.com)
We are bound within causality of this universe. Every effect tangible or intangible is not without cause. The reason I believe that god can disappear and re-appear is because, I “expect” him to achieve this with tremendous ease. There is an idea and then there is a belief in possibility of this idea. But where does this idea come from ?
Either there has been substantial evidence of such an event in the past, which makes me expect a recurrence.
Or, I simply am the first to imagine such an event and expect it to manifest some point in time. In this case it is also a certain intuition a more inherent form of expectation. Something inseparable from my existence.
In either case, the root premise is expectation. So much so that belief itself is Ego! Expectation is nothing but the self-individuation, the projection of existence in this material frame , the reflection of our awareness in this world. As long as the ego remains, expectations will remain, beliefs will be formed, destroyed and reformed. Only when the ego dies, expectations die.
Love is nothing but the death of ego. Love is not an emotion, say like compassion. It is merely a state, a very high state of the mind. Ego is the barrier between the higher mind and its smaller projection that we struggle with in our day to day life. The Ego dies and connects us to a something gargantuan, something beyond measure.
- Advice from Your Ego? (tonningsen.wordpress.com)
- Dan replied to the topic Catholicism: Net good or bad? in the forum Epiphanies & Ideas (highexistence.com)
- Quora: In what ways could I lower my ego? (konradkonczakislam.wordpress.com)
- Solutions Needed (sanora1.wordpress.com)
- WakingTimes – Why We Get Mad When Others Challenge What We Believe In – 15 October 2013 (lucas2012infos.wordpress.com)
- Cultural Marxism, Totalitarianism and the Death of Belief (deadcitizensrightssociety.wordpress.com)
- ego and super-ego (desideratumistic.wordpress.com)
- Round One… Fight! (Epistemology) (xvxerikxvx.wordpress.com)
- Energy Follows Thought – Expectations vs. Intentions (blairishwisdom.wordpress.com)
I: Well… your mind (for thought), your mouth (for speech) are just for pure sensory pleasures.
Doing has to be understood in a wider sense than that. Doing encompasses the above. It is simple like the answer to the question “Hey what are you doing ?” you say “Reading”
Q: The mind is more than a pleasure generating device …
I: Mm, yes, the mind does more than that. It can be used for:
- mental rumination: -> chew the cud (past, present or future happenings) over and over again
- mental escapism:-> run from thoughts of things labeled (social taboos, bad, indecent) if they still buzz around, try and swat them.
I: I don’t seem to use, I use those words. One should be articulate, saves time and text. :-)Q: The mind can be used for thinking about doing something good
I: Yes, just don’t waste too much time thinking about it -> To do it… just do it. With utmost comfort.Q: Then it is just fine to commit a murder … provided I be very comfortable doing it?
I: Comfort I know of and you speak of, are two very different things. Would you be really comfortable murdering someone ? If you were comfortable, would you really want to murder someone? smilesQ: So what is it, what is the comfort?
I: I have used a label comfort. Comfort actually doesnt mean anything. Comfort does not mean pleasure, gratification or something that suits you. This is a native more basic comfort. Comfort to be what you really are. There is no analysis at that point.Q: Is there no analysis, or no scope or no need for analysis?
I: It is more a thing to be, I am the knowledge, does knowledge question itself? It is always busy being itself. So you can say, that there is no scope for analysis.